{"id":60266,"date":"2020-04-06T09:31:04","date_gmt":"2020-04-06T14:31:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eshop.macsales.com\/blog\/?p=60266"},"modified":"2020-05-04T15:30:37","modified_gmt":"2020-05-04T20:30:37","slug":"work-from-home-essentials-photoshop-alternative-affinity-photo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eshop.macsales.com\/blog\/60266-work-from-home-essentials-photoshop-alternative-affinity-photo\/","title":{"rendered":"Work From Home Essentials: Photoshop Alternative \u2013 Affinity Photo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"Affinity<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

COVID-19 has dramatically changed the way millions of people work. Many OWC customers are impacted, including creative professionals like photographers, illustrators, and graphic designers\u2014and now Work From Home (WFH). The Rocket Yard has readied a new series for our friends in the creative space, to introduce the\u00a0Affinity suite<\/a>\u00a0of applications from\u00a0Serif<\/a>. If you are a creative professional or an aspiring digital artist looking for alternatives to Adobe\u2019s subscription plans, now is a great time to consider a switch. To\u00a0do their part,<\/a>\u00a0Serif has temporarily\u00a0reduced its prices<\/a>\u00a0by 50% for the entire suite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s worth pointing out that these are not product reviews or how-to articles, but a general comparison between applications. Ultimately any switch has to benefit the user in terms of cost, efficiency, or both. Canceling a Creative Cloud subscription and\/or subscribing to only one or two apps, can drive the cost down from the default $52.99\/month (and counting) to $20.99\/month for most apps or $41.98\/month for two. Saving roughly $10-30 per month is a big deal for many artists, especially in challenging times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We know some artists are OK with Adobe\u2019s subscription plans, and none of what you\u2019ll read is to suggest that Adobe\u2019s solutions are anything but capable. But quite a few might find these new apps (or a mix of apps) to be exactly what they need. Our first article covers Affinity Photo. Later this week, you can learn about Affinity Designer and Publisher.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Affinity Photo<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Background<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"Affinity<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

For photographers and hobbyists, the range of available desktop editing apps offer every type of color and tone correction and virtually every type of retouching capability they could need. As Photoshop\u2019s traditional photo-centric capabilities begin to reach their limits, Adobe started to refine existing features and address long-standing customer-requests, which is good. They\u2019ve also begun integrating ML (Machine Learning) algorithms into the \u2018content-aware\u2019 retouching features to make them better at predicting the type of change the user wants to make.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Photoshop is no longer the only heavy hitter on the block. For example, products like Pixelmator Pro<\/a> and Affinity Photo<\/a> offer serious competition across the typical spectrum of photo editing tasks. There are several others worth mentioning, including Capture One<\/a> and DxO Photo Lab<\/a>. For many people, the newer of these apps provide options that are more affordable and perform better on their Mac and PC than Photoshop CC. For example, there are generally more hardware-accelerated features in the newer apps than in Photoshop, taking better advantage of built-in or external GPUs. Competition in any space is always a good thing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We chose to look at Affinity Photo because it is available on Mac and PC (as well as a capable iPad edition), includes a professional feature set<\/a>, and offers an affordable perpetual license that is currently just $24.99. Also important is that most of your Photoshop skills will translate directly to Affinity Photo; there are only a few areas where you might have to \u201crelearn\u201d certain tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UI Comparison<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Adobe has put considerable effort into updating the Photoshop UI over the last several releases, to make it more streamlined and modern-looking. So, it\u2019s no surprise that compared to a new competitor like Affinity Photo (designed with a modern UI from the start) there are many similarities. Both default to a dark-themed UI with some ability in Preferences to separately lighten or darken the canvas or artboard area, as well as the rest of the on-screen elements. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takeaway:<\/strong> there\u2019s no distinct advantage here to either app; both allow you to configure things in a way that won\u2019t strain your eyes, whether you like the classic light grey UI theme or dark-themed elements.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n\t
\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\"\"<\/a><\/td>\n\t\t\t\t\t\"\"<\/a> \n\t\t\t\t\t<\/td>\n\t\t\t\t<\/tr>\n\t\t\t<\/tbody>\n\t\t<\/table>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tAdobe Photoshop UI vs. Affinity Photo UI \n\t\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption>\n\t<\/figure>\n<\/center>\n\n\n\n

The way the two UIs group their editing tools, display the options for those tools, and group the various panels for layers, channels, history states, and other common image elements, are also mostly alike. Both apps default to a setup where all elements and the document are grouped into a single window, with tool icons displayed down the left edge, modifiers and options across the top of the window, and the various tabbed panels down the right side of the window.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takeaway:<\/strong> there are a few semantic differences between elements, but for the most part, if you\u2019re comfortable navigating one UI, you will be comfortable with the other UI.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Adjustments<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

There are a couple differences worth mentioning. The most obvious is the image adjustments configuration. Both apps default to a single panel that groups all image adjustment commands (like Curves and Vibrance), and in both cases clicking an adjustment icon opens its settings in a separate area and creates an adjustment layer. However, Photoshop uses the screen space more efficiently and is a bit easier to use. All of the adjustments use the same Properties panel, and the panel itself can be grouped with any of the others, providing more flexibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Affinity Photo instead provides a panel list of all adjustments, which cannot be customized (i.e., adjustments added, removed, or re-ordered). When you click a list item, that section of the panel expands to display 3-5 one-click presets (complete with a live preview, which is nice) and then opens the related settings in a floating window. And while that window expands or contracts based on the next adjustment used, it cannot be grouped with other panels. In general, Affinity Photo does not allow multiple columns of connected panel groups and does not allow a panel column to be individually resized into a group of buttons or icons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"screenshot<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The other notable UI difference is how the workspaces are organized and accessed (called \u201cPersonas\u201d in Affinity Photo). Here again, Photoshop provides some advantages in terms of the ability to customize and more easily switch between groups of panels and settings. It boils down to a fully customizable option in Photoshop versus a collection of fixed workspaces in Affinity Photo that follow the most common stages of editing a photo, along with a couple others. The default workspace is called \u201cPhoto,\u201d though it\u2019s a general-purpose setup \u2014 similar to \u201cEssentials\u201d in Photoshop \u2014 where you can focus either on photo editing tasks or more creative tasks like drawing, painting, or working with vector shapes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Others include: <\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Develop<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

As you might guess, this is the default when you open a raw image. It provides tonal corrections, lens corrections, noise reduction, etc. It is a close approximation to ACR (Adobe Camera Raw). However, ACR offers more granular control in a few areas, and overall, is probably the more capable raw processing \u201cmodule.\u201d This is not unexpected given that Adobe (technically Thomas Knoll) literally pioneered raw processing. That said, Affinity Photo\u2019s Develop persona supports an impressive list of camera types<\/a> and lens profiles, including the recent addition of the Canon CR3 format. On balance, for shots taken with proper exposure, what you accomplish in ACR you can achieve in Affinity Photo, but you may take a slightly different route to get there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"screenshot<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Tone Mapping<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Affinity\u2019s approach to working with HDR or 32-bit images, and is organized and set up in much the same way as the Develop persona.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Export<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Exactly what it sounds like, though you can use the standard File > Export approach just as easily. Affinity Photo supports a large number of standard formats, including but not limited to PSD, EXR, TIFF, PNG, JPEG, and others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Liquify<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Focuses on exactly what it sounds like: grid-warping regions of the image using a familiar set of brushes and effects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"screenshot<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Familiar Work<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Affinity Photo does a great job of not forcing Photoshop users to relearn core editing tasks. Other than the afore-mentioned UI differences, you\u2019re likely to find pretty much everything where you\u2019d expect, and the time required to figure out individual functions will be minimal in most cases. We compare a few of the core features below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brushes, Brush Parameters<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The Brushes panel and Brush Editing dialog provide the high degree of control and ease-of-use you\u2019d expect from a true Photoshop competitor. The available list of brush types is impressive. It includes the standard generic brush types but also many that mimic real-world media like chalks, charcoal, oil paints, watercolors, and others \u2014 all easily accessed and previewed from the Brushes panel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In terms of customization, the brush editor is accessed from the same panel and provides everything from tablet dynamics to baseline settings like accumulation, spacing, and brush rotation. There\u2019s also a Paint Mixer brush which allows you to seamlessly blend colors and textures on the canvas, with real-time feedback. There are also powerful symmetry options. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takeaway:<\/strong> Affinity Photo will provide the level of brush control you need for all photo retouching and creative arts. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\"screenshot<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Selection Methods<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

While they don\u2019t all use the same names, a familiar list of selection methods are available, including marquee and lasso types, a Flood selection option (similar to Photoshop\u2019s Magic Wand), the ability to create selections with a brush, and some basic color and tonal range selection commands. All initial selections can be refined using a process that is similar in concept to Photoshop\u2019s original Refine Selection mode (before it got its own workspace and optimizations). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

One area that needs improvement: Affinity Photo\u2019s color selection commands and options are not as accurate as Photoshop\u2019s when applied to images with subtle color gradients, so that might give a Photoshop user pause if they rely heavily on color selection workflows. But, you can also use a Flood selection with a low Tolerance setting on a given color, and then use the Refine options (particularly the Border Width and Ramp) to quickly arrive at a good result in many cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takeaway:<\/strong> a skilled editor should be able to generate precise selections in Affinity Photo, but it may require more trial and error than Photoshop (at least for now).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Retouching<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Here again, many of Photoshop\u2019s most popular methods for retouching portraits or other imagery are available in Affinity Photo, including but not limited to: a Clone brush, Dodge and Burn, Healing brush, Patch-and-replace, Blemish Removal brush (similar to Spot Healing in Photoshop), Red Eye removal, cropping and perspective corrections, and others. There is also the full range of filter types (including non-destructive options) like Gaussian Blur, Lens Blur, Depth of Field Blur, Unsharp Mask, High Pass, typical transform and warping options, Detect Edges, Noise Reduction, Haze Removal, and many others any experienced Photoshop user will know. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That said, Photoshop does retain some advantage in the area of Content-Aware fill \/ replace type commands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takeaway<\/strong>: there are more than enough powerful options in Affinity Photo to support a professional workflow though even though there are more Content-Aware enabled commands in Photoshop.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Add-ons<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Affinity Photo provides full support for 64-bit Photoshop plugins, The Nik Suite from DxO, and LAB plugins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Layers <\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The Layers panel will be immediately familiar to anyone who has learned Photoshop, with only minor cosmetic and semantic differences. Earlier, we noted the unusual configuration of the Adjustments panel. Well, if you decide that\u2019s not for you, you can easily create each type of Adjustment layer directly from the bottom of the Layers panel (via drop-down menu). The same is true of all Live Filters like Gaussian Blur or High Pass, as well as Layer Fx like Outer or Inner Shadow (or Glow). You can also create and clip layer masks and group them using folders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takeaway:<\/strong> Affinity Photo provides the level of layer and mask control required for a wide variety of workflows.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\"screenshot<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

History<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Affinity Photo provides a very similar mechanism for managing history states, including the use of returning portions of an image back to an earlier state using the Undo Brush (like the History Brush in Photoshop), as well as a Snapshots feature. One minor difference (some would say an advantage) is the Affinity Photo\u2019s History panel uses a Position control to scroll-and-step backward and forward through an image\u2019s history states, providing a live preview as you go.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takeaway:<\/strong> Affinity Photo will provide the level of history state control you need for all retouching and creative workflows.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\"screenshot<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

There are other important components to an image editing workflow (like working with channels, text, and color modes). Still, hopefully, these core items provide a sense of just how similar the applications are in their overall makeup and capabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cost Considerations<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

While each person is different, the most common reason to contemplate a switch from Photoshop is to avoid Adobe\u2019s subscription plans. To be fair, Photoshop is the best value Adobe offers in the sense that it has the lowest subscription price. How much the cost of subscriptions affect a given person will depend on whether they\u2019re a student, individual, or a business, and other factors. But when you go the subscription route, you are agreeing that you own the software and the right to use it, for a specified period of time. If the period expires, you\u2019re stuck until you pay again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In fairness to Adobe, they\u2019re not the only (or even the first) major developer to use this payment model, and their price points remain relatively reasonable compared to other developers like AutoDesk. Additionally, developers like to suggest that one benefit of a subscription model is that the application(s) will be updated more frequently, allowing customers to benefit from more innovation. In practice, this has been hit or miss with Creative Cloud updates. Some interim updates provide only modest functional improvements and bug fixes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

For people who use Photoshop regularly, we can look at a typical scenario (without the current 50% off pricing). Let\u2019s say you will use the software for the next 3 years. Further, we\u2019ll say that starting tomorrow, Serif releases Affinity Photo 2.0 and follows a once-every-18-months major upgrade cycle, with free, smaller upgrades in the interim. We\u2019ll say the cost is a bit more than half the regular license fee \u2013 $30 to be safe. To get three years of Affinity Photo in this scenario and always stay current, your cost would be about $110 (roughly: $50 tomorrow + $30 in 18 months + $30 more 18 months after that). If you decide to stop upgrading at any point, you can continue to use the last version you purchased (indefinitely). Interesting note: Serif has not yet charged for an upgrade to Photos \u2013 every major and minor update thus far has been free<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

To get three years of only Photoshop (and Lightroom, which is included in the photo bundle) at the annual pre-paid cost \u2014 instead of billed monthly, which is slightly more \u2014 you pay roughly $120 per year or $360. To get three years of the Adobe suite at the annual pre-paid cost, you pay roughly $1800. In either case, if you decide to stop after three years, you no longer have a working copy of Photoshop (or Lightroom) to use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some people don\u2019t mind subscription costs in the sense that it may be only a small portion of their hardware and software budget. And there is no one right answer, but it\u2019s for individual photographers (pro or hobbyist), so long as you don\u2019t have a pressing need for other CC apps, you might find Affinity Photo to be a great value. Next up, we\u2019ll look at Affinity Publisher, then wrap up the week with Affinity Designer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\t

\n\t\tMore Work From Home Essentials\n\t<\/h4>\n\t