XposFacto vs Sonnet |
November, 09, 2002 4:35 PM |
ejlmp |
I have tried Sonnet's PCI X install which failed 3 x and Xpostfacto which worked the first time. With Sonnet's method, it calls for downloading from Apple the Startup Panel 1.0 for OS 9.2.1. The Xpostfacto 2.2.4 apparently doesn't require that or did I miss that in the instructions? I already had the Startup Panel 1.0 from failed Sonnet attempts and I'm using that with OS 10.2 installed via XpostFacto. Does XpostFacto need the Startup Panel 1.0 for OS 9.2.1 from Apple to work or does Xpostfacto take care of that need? Thanks very much? Eric |
. |
RE: XposFacto vs Sonnet |
November, 10, 2002 2:10 AM |
ejlmp |
. |
Thanks for your reply. I found that XPF does that automatically too. Eric |
. |
RE: XposFacto vs Sonnet |
November, 09, 2002 6:49 PM |
tbuckley |
. |
The newer version of Sonnets PCI X does not require that you do that any more. I have used both Sonnet and XpostFacto and have had both work well. Tim |