Skip to main content

Send us a Topic or Tip

Have a suggestion for the blog? Perhaps a topic you'd like us to write about? If so, we'd love to hear from you! Fancy yourself a writer and have a tech tip, handy computer trick, or "how to" to share? Let us know what you'd like to contribute!

Thanks for reaching out!

Mac mini can make your power bill a mini, too!

Maybe it’s just where I work, but it seems like I’ve been hearing a lot about the Mac mini lately. From upgrading the mini Servers, to adding one to your home theater system, to fixing the one in my Dad’s office—and that’s just what I’ve written about—it’s been quite a while since I’ve gone more than a day or two without hearing about Apple’s little headless wonder.

The popularity is not surprising. Its relative silence and small form factor make it great for integrating into all sorts of projects or layouts. The price point is nice for those who already have their own peripherals (or who have friends/family members they can “borrow” them from) and don’t want to drop more cash on an iMac with a built-in display. However, it’s powerful enough for most people’s usage; unless you’re a hardcore gamer or work in Photoshop or Final Cut, it should be able to handle most of what you can throw at it.

What a lot of people tend to overlook, though, is that the mini can also help keep your energy bill down.

According to Apple’s info, a new mini consumes less than 14 watts of energy when idle. I would suspect, however, that a large chunk of this low score is likely due to the fact that there is no monitor attached. Having a dedicated display would likely pump up the kilowatt-hours over time. But when you consider the things that you can use a Mac mini for without a dedicated display (file server, HTPC, etc.), this savings due to no display can be a benefit.

One guy started running a Mac mini as opposed to an HP Pavilion. He used each as a torrent server (no display needed) and for watching videos on his TV (TV is the display, which would be in use anyway for a HTPC) and found the mini lessened his power bill about $12 a month. He didn’t quite say how much that translated into actual electricity used, but $12 a month is still $12 a month.

Would I ever ditch my MacBook Pro or my work Mac Pro for a mini? As my primary computer, no; I do too much graphic and video work. Would I recommend one to my mother or my sister, who don’t have nearly as high-end computer needs? Most assuredly.

That extra $12 a month they save could add up to a nicer birthday present for me next year…

OWC Chris S.
the authorOWC Chris S.
Be Sociable, Share This Post!

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

  • Yeah, the current Mac mini’s are pretty sweet. The performance on them now is pretty impressive.

    I currently have a Mac Pro Quad 2.66 and especially enjoy the 4 internal HD bays, but I’ve pretty much decided that it will be replaced with a Mac mini.

    When that time comes, I will have to use a stack of FW800 HD enclosures to make up for the 4 HD bays in the Mac Pro. But ideally I would like to have an enclosure like the Qx2 but with the option as a JBOD instead of RAID.

    And to take this idea little further, a Mac mini version of the Qx2 that is designed with a NuShelf/NuStand/NuCube style mount on top to contain the Mac mini. :-)

    OWC could market this as “Make a Mac Pro out of your Mac mini” or “Make your own Mac mini Server.” :-)